nanog mailing list archives
Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you.
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 18:58:47 +0900
I expect there will be a depressingly large amount of DNS-over-TLS in the future in order to bypass broken ALGs.
there may be a lot of foo-over-https to bypass broken nats in the core, and the edge, and whatever restrictive middleboxes political disfunction creates. because of st00pidity, we will go up a layer to try to reestablish end to end. randy
Current thread:
- Re: isc - a good business, (continued)
- Re: isc - a good business Paul Vixie (May 28)
- NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Jay Ashworth (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Jay Ashworth (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. bmanning (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Message not available
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. George Herbert (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Randy Bush (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Tony Finch (May 29)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Randy Bush (May 29)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Jimmy Hess (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Jimmy Hess (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Paul Vixie (May 30)
- Re: isc - a good business Andrew D Kirch (May 30)
- Re: isc - a good business valdis . kletnieks (May 30)