nanog mailing list archives
Re: isc - a good business
From: Andrew D Kirch <trelane () trelane net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 22:30:15 -0400
Paul,I just wanted to point out that you're a horrible person for employing people at a sustainable level, for giving away the product of your company for free, and for having the temerity to assist the FBI, on break-even basis ensuring that users of the internet continue to have access to DNS. HOW DARE YOU SIR?
Andrew On 5/30/2012 10:06 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:
On 2012-05-30 12:53 AM, Nabil Sharma wrote:Paul: Where can we read details about the services ISC provided to the FBI, and how they were compensated?it's in the AP News article published a few weeks ago. for an example: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/04/23/hundreds-thousands-may-lose-internet-in-july/As Mahatma Gandhi says: it is difficult, but not impossible, to conduct strictly honest business. Sincerely, Nabilthe FBI's business dealings are transparent in this case. judge for yourself whether it's also strictly honest. paul
Current thread:
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you., (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. George Herbert (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Randy Bush (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Tony Finch (May 29)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Randy Bush (May 29)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Jimmy Hess (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Jimmy Hess (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Paul Vixie (May 30)
- Re: isc - a good business Andrew D Kirch (May 30)
- Re: isc - a good business valdis . kletnieks (May 30)