nanog mailing list archives
RE: isc - a good business
From: Nabil Sharma <nabilsharma () hotmail com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 00:53:44 +0000
Paul: Where can we read details about the services ISC provided to the FBI, and how they were compensated? As Mahatma Gandhi says: it is difficult, but not impossible, to conduct strictly honest business. Sincerely, Nabil
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 20:52:07 +0900 From: randy () psg com To: vixie () isc org Subject: Re: isc - a good business CC: nanog () nanog org fwiw, i think isc and isc staff are very well intentioned and do a lot of good work for the community. i have doubts about isc's business model, but definitely not that it makes too much money or is greedy. maybe a bit too much layer ten for my taste. and i run and appreciate the software. randy
Current thread:
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you., (continued)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. bmanning (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Message not available
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. George Herbert (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Randy Bush (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Tony Finch (May 29)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Randy Bush (May 29)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Jimmy Hess (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Jimmy Hess (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Paul Vixie (May 30)
- Re: isc - a good business Andrew D Kirch (May 30)
- Re: isc - a good business valdis . kletnieks (May 30)