nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
From: Wil Schultz <wschultz () bsdboy com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 20:14:19 -0700
On May 26, 2011 7:54 PM, "David Conrad" <drc () virtualized org> wrote:
On May 26, 2011, at 4:50 PM, Wil Schultz wrote:There are some similarities between bands and ipv4 exhaustion, sure...
One
major difference is that those using ipv4 have the option of using ipv6,Out of curiosity, is there an IPv6 stack for ham devices? Regards, -drc
Well there's a loaded question. So a traditional ham device is a radio, so any protocol you want to run on top of a radio wave is possible. There are some radios that do have ways to transfer data, like slow scan and psk31, but that's usually done by a device connected to the radio. I won't say that there aren't "ham devices" with an IP stack built in, but I think we're talking about different layers here. -wil
Current thread:
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space), (continued)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Carl Rosevear (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) David Conrad (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Jack Carrozzo (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Jaime Magiera (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Carl Rosevear (May 26)
- RE: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Jack Carrozzo (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Owen DeLong (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Wil Schultz (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) David Conrad (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Wil Schultz (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) David Conrad (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Lyndon Nerenberg (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Adrian Chadd (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) William Allen Simpson (May 27)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Simon Leinen (May 28)