Re: 23,000 IP addresses

[Mark Radabaugh <mark () amplex net>]

On 5/10/11 8:30 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Mark Radabaugh<mark () amplex net>  wrote:
> > On 5/10/11 9:07 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> > A good reason why every ISP should have a published civil subpoena
> > compliance fee.
> > 23,000 * $150 each should only cost them $3.45M to get the information.
> > Seems like that would take the profit out pretty quickly.
> +1.
> But don't the fees actually have to be reasonable?
Facebook charges $150.00  (not a great link but 
http://lawyerist.com/subpoena-facebook-information/

Finding that on facebook's site is difficult.  Other sites have Facebook 
charging $250 to $500 for civil subpoena fees.

Courts like precedent.  I choose Facebook's precedent.  Seems reasonable 
to me.

Mark