nanog mailing list archives

Re: 23,000 IP addresses


From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:42:33 -0400

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Michael Holstein
<michael.holstein () csuohio edu> wrote:

I wonder how things go if you challenge them in court.  This is surely a
topic for another list, but it seems to me it'd be fairly difficult to
prove unless they downloaded part of the movie from your IP and verified
that what they got really was a part of the movie.

I have the netflow records to prove this is NOT the case. All
MediaSentry (et.al.) do is scrape the tracker. We have also received a
number of takedown notices that have numbers transposed, involve parts
of our netblock that were not in use at the time in question, etc.

this is exactly the same situation I outlined previously...
darknet/tcdump can't be a bittorrent user.

I would think that whole "penalty of perjury" thing would have some
weight behind it.

apparently not :( (I'd say something about lobbyists et.al, but...)

-chris


Current thread: