nanog mailing list archives
Re: Regional AS model
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:53:56 +0100
On 27/03/2011 07:53, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Accepting default is not ugly, especially if you don't even have a backbone connecting your sites. And even if we could argue over default's aesthetic qualities (which, honestly, I don't see how we can), there is no rational person who would consider it a hack.
accepting default has one important drawback for smaller networks: it causes loose urpf not to work for transit connections, and this causes remotely triggered blackhole discards not to work as expected. Depending on your requirements, this may or may not be a concern to worry about.
Nick
Current thread:
- Re: Regional AS model, (continued)
- Re: Regional AS model Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Bill Woodcock (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Michael Hallgren (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Christopher LILJENSTOLPE (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Zaid Ali (Mar 25)
- Re: Regional AS model Michael Hallgren (Mar 25)
- Re: Regional AS model Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Owen DeLong (Mar 25)
- Re: Regional AS model David Freedman (Mar 25)
- Re: Regional AS model Owen DeLong (Mar 25)
- Re: Regional AS model Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 26)
- Re: Regional AS model Nick Hilliard (Mar 27)
- Re: Regional AS model Nick Hilliard (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model Dave Temkin (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model Jeff Wheeler (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model David Conrad (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Danny McPherson (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Jeffrey S. Young (Mar 24)