RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses

[Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband com>]

And that will teach me not to read the thread!

--
Leigh

________________________________________
From: Tom Hill [tom () ninjabadger net]
Sent: 16 June 2011 13:46
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses

On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 11:30 +0000, Leigh Porter wrote:
> I have not followed this whole thread, but did anybody suggest just
> using IPv6 for this?

I was going to mention this, but it's only the neighbor address that is
IPv6. You still need an IPv4 next-hop and that is where the issue is in
using RFC1918 within this scenario.

Tom



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________