nanog mailing list archives

Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses

From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:54:41 +0100

On 15/06/2011 17:47, James Grace wrote:

So we're running out of peering space in our /24 and we were considering
using private /30's for new peerings.  Are there any horrific
consequences to picking up this practice?

yes. it causes nasty problems if you use urpf (as you should), inparticular with pmtu discovery and traceroute.


Nick

Current thread:

Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses James Grace (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 15)
  - Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses isabel dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Nick Hilliard (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Cameron Byrne (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses isabel dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Jeff Wheeler (Jun 16)
  - RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Leigh Porter (Jun 16)
    - RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Tom Hill (Jun 16)
    - RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Leigh Porter (Jun 16)
  - Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Adam Rothschild (Jun 16)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Gaurab Raj Upadhaya (Jun 16)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Dobbins, Roland (Jun 21)