nanog mailing list archives

Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses


From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:54:11 -0400

On Jun 15, 2011, at 12:47 PM, James Grace wrote:

So we're running out of peering space in our /24 and we were considering using private /30's for new peerings.  Are 
there any horrific consequences to picking up this practice?

"Horrific"?  How about: "Most peers won't bring up a session."

What happens if the peer is using 1918 space internally?

-- 
TTFN,
patrick



Current thread: