nanog mailing list archives
Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:56:52 -0700
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:47 AM, James Grace <james () cs fiu edu> wrote:
Hey All, So we're running out of peering space in our /24 and we were considering using private /30's for new peerings. Are there any horrific consequences to picking up this practice?
You can reclaim space by switching your peerings to /31s where possible. If you go down the private space route, make sure you and your peers know about "next hop self" Cameron
Current thread:
- Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses James Grace (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses isabel dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Nick Hilliard (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Cameron Byrne (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses isabel dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Jeff Wheeler (Jun 16)
- RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Leigh Porter (Jun 16)
- RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Tom Hill (Jun 16)
- RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Leigh Porter (Jun 16)
- RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Leigh Porter (Jun 16)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Adam Rothschild (Jun 16)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Gaurab Raj Upadhaya (Jun 16)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Dobbins, Roland (Jun 21)