Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day

[Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com>]

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
> > On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Martin Millnert wrote:
> >
> > > Owen,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
> > > > LSN is required when access providers come across the following two
> > > > combined constraints:
> > > >
> > > >        1.      No more IPv4 addresses to give to customers.
> > > >        2.      No ability to deploy those customers on IPv6.
> > >
> > > 2 has little bearing on need of LSN to access v4.  Insufficient amount
> > > of IPv4 addresses => LSN required.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Martin
> >
> > No, if you have the option of deploying the customers on IPv6, you don't
> > need LSN.
> >
> > The problem is that until the vast majority of content is dual-stack, you can't
> > deploy customers on IPv6 without IPv4.
>
> cough cough NAT64/DNS64 ...

cough DS-lite.

Cameron

> Cameron
>
> > Owen