nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:00:43 -0600
On 2/3/2011 7:50 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
It doesn't appear to be blindingly simple for the cpe-router-bis draft, which leaves it as TBD, or the cpe-router draft which also is silent. General consensus I got from v6ops was that IAIDs won't be utilized by CPE routers, which means they don't expect your requesting upstream logic.This was blindling obvious to me years ago and should have been to any CPE developer.
In fact, they didn't seem to like any of my ideas on versatility for handling this job, which means we'll likely have interoperability problems between CPE manufacturers.
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: quietly...., (continued)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Scott Helms (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Joe Greco (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... R A Lichtensteiger (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Joel Jaeggli (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 04)