nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST and SP800-119
From: Joe Abley <jabley () hopcount ca>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:06:09 -0500
On 2011-02-15, at 10:36, William Herrin wrote:
Are you aware of a TCP implementation in an OS that shipped within the last decade but doesn't enable IPv4 pMTUd by default?
I am not, but I'd still be vaguely interested in an actual study :-) The last time I tangled with v4 pMTUd it actually was a decade or more ago. At that time wholesale ICMP blocking caused all kinds of problems for clients with a sub-ethernet MTU in their path. If the world has moved on, that seems good :-) Joe
Current thread:
- NIST and SP800-119 TR Shaw (Feb 14)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 William Herrin (Feb 14)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Joe Abley (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 William Herrin (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Joe Abley (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Steven Bellovin (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Mohacsi Janos (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Mans Nilsson (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Joe Abley (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Jared Mauch (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 William Herrin (Feb 14)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Douglas Otis (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Joe Abley (Feb 16)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Douglas Otis (Feb 16)