nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST and SP800-119
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:41:17 -0500
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:24 PM, TR Shaw <tshaw () oitc com> wrote:
Just wondering what this community thinks of NIST in general and their SP800-119 ( http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-119/sp800-119.pdf ) writeup about IPv6 in particular.
Well, according to this document IPv4 path MTU discovery is, "optional, not widely used." -Bill -- William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
Current thread:
- NIST and SP800-119 TR Shaw (Feb 14)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 William Herrin (Feb 14)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Joe Abley (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 William Herrin (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Joe Abley (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Steven Bellovin (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Mohacsi Janos (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Mans Nilsson (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Joe Abley (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Jared Mauch (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 William Herrin (Feb 14)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Douglas Otis (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Joe Abley (Feb 16)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Douglas Otis (Feb 16)