nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST and SP800-119
From: Rafael Rodriguez <packetjockey () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:43:52 -0500
I've spent some time reading through it over the past couple of days and it seems to be very good so far (have read up to end of section 3). On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:24 PM, TR Shaw <tshaw () oitc com> wrote:
Just wondering what this community thinks of NIST in general and their SP800-119 ( http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-119/sp800-119.pdf ) writeup about IPv6 in particular.
Current thread:
- Re: NIST and SP800-119, (continued)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Joe Abley (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 William Herrin (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Joe Abley (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Steven Bellovin (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Mohacsi Janos (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Mans Nilsson (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Joe Abley (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Jared Mauch (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Douglas Otis (Feb 15)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Joe Abley (Feb 16)
- Re: NIST and SP800-119 Douglas Otis (Feb 16)