nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft JMRP (Mail) Admin Needed
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:07:57 +0530
Sure. But it is common courtesy to ask an abuse desk first, rather than, say, flood their ticketing system with automated alerts. On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager () wiktel com> wrote:
I think the implied point here is that this can be a LOT of mail and that obtaining the recipient's consent is desirable before sending them this volume of mail? If so, I think that's a fair point. On the other hand, the complaints are in response to messages their network sent in the first place.
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Microsoft JMRP (Mail) Admin Needed Richard Laager (Dec 19)
- Re: Microsoft JMRP (Mail) Admin Needed Seth Mattinen (Dec 19)
- Re: Microsoft JMRP (Mail) Admin Needed Michael J Wise (Dec 19)
- Re: Microsoft JMRP (Mail) Admin Needed Richard Laager (Dec 19)
- Re: Microsoft JMRP (Mail) Admin Needed Mike Hale (Dec 19)
- Re: Microsoft JMRP (Mail) Admin Needed Richard Laager (Dec 19)
- Re: Microsoft JMRP (Mail) Admin Needed Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 19)
- Re: Microsoft JMRP (Mail) Admin Needed Richard Laager (Dec 19)
- Re: Microsoft JMRP (Mail) Admin Needed Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 19)
- Re: Microsoft JMRP (Mail) Admin Needed Richard Laager (Dec 19)