nanog mailing list archives
Re: Quick IP6/BGP question
From: Joe Abley <jabley () hopcount ca>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 20:53:41 +0200
On 2010-05-25, at 17:40, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
On 24/05/10 19:21, Thomas Magill wrote:From the provider side, are most of you who are implementing IP6peerings running BGP over IP4 and just using IP6 address families to exchange routes or doing IP6 peering?Most Internet Exchanges do not allow to mix on the same transport. So IPv4 peering over IPv4 transport, IPv6 peering over IPv6 transport, you can use the same interface though.
Most Internet Exchanges don't care what BGP protocol options consenting neighbours decide to use, in my experience. (If they cared, what could they do?) Joe
Current thread:
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question, (continued)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Kevin Oberman (May 24)
- RE: Quick IP6/BGP question Michael K. Smith - Adhost (May 24)
- RE: Quick IP6/BGP question Justin M. Streiner (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Chuck Anderson (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Owen DeLong (May 24)
- RE: Quick IP6/BGP question Thomas Magill (May 24)
- RE: Quick IP6/BGP question George, Wes E IV [NTK] (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Andy Davidson (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Seth Mattinen (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Martin List-Petersen (May 25)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Joe Abley (May 26)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Patrick W. Gilmore (May 26)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Martin List-Petersen (May 26)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Joe Abley (May 26)