nanog mailing list archives
Re: Quick IP6/BGP question
From: Chuck Anderson <cra () WPI EDU>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 14:30:29 -0400
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:21:45AM -0700, Thomas Magill wrote:
From the provider side, are most of you who are implementing IP6 peerings running BGP over IP4 and just using IP6 address families to exchange routes or doing IP6 peering?
I've never liked how you have to configure ::w.x.y.z/96 style IPv4-compatible IPv6 addresses in order to use IPv6 NLRIs with IPv4 BGP sessions, so I've always used separate native IPv6 sessions.
Current thread:
- Quick IP6/BGP question Thomas Magill (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Kevin Oberman (May 24)
- RE: Quick IP6/BGP question Michael K. Smith - Adhost (May 24)
- RE: Quick IP6/BGP question Justin M. Streiner (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Chuck Anderson (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Owen DeLong (May 24)
- RE: Quick IP6/BGP question Thomas Magill (May 24)
- RE: Quick IP6/BGP question George, Wes E IV [NTK] (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Andy Davidson (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Seth Mattinen (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Martin List-Petersen (May 25)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Joe Abley (May 26)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Patrick W. Gilmore (May 26)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Martin List-Petersen (May 26)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Joe Abley (May 26)