nanog mailing list archives
Re: Quick IP6/BGP question
From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman () es net>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:26:10 -0700
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:21:45 -0700 From: "Thomas Magill" <tmagill () providecommerce com>From the provider side, are most of you who are implementing IP6peerings running BGP over IP4 and just using IP6 address families to exchange routes or doing IP6 peering?
Can't speak for "most of us", but we run an iBGP v4 mesh carrying both v4 and v6 routes. For external peers, we run separate peerings. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman () es net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
Current thread:
- Quick IP6/BGP question Thomas Magill (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Kevin Oberman (May 24)
- RE: Quick IP6/BGP question Michael K. Smith - Adhost (May 24)
- RE: Quick IP6/BGP question Justin M. Streiner (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Chuck Anderson (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Owen DeLong (May 24)
- RE: Quick IP6/BGP question Thomas Magill (May 24)
- RE: Quick IP6/BGP question George, Wes E IV [NTK] (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Andy Davidson (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Seth Mattinen (May 24)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Martin List-Petersen (May 25)
- Re: Quick IP6/BGP question Joe Abley (May 26)
(Thread continues...)