nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSP-SEC
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:19:26 -0400
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:43:18 BST, Guillaume FORTAINE said:
First question : Why was I able to find this mail on the Internet if it should be kept secret ?
Congratulations. You found an example of a mailing list where applying a standard disclaimer by default *does* make sense, which then got forwarded *by a coordination team leader at a national CERT* to an appropriate forum so that action could be taken, but failed to take the disclaimer off the bottom of that posting. Double bonus points for finding a posting that discussed something *really* sensitive, like "we've seen bots connecting to...". You *do* realize that there's an estimated 140,000,000 bots on the net, right, and as a result, some operation lists have *dozens* of "bots spotted connecting to" postings *per day*. And you wonder why you have a hard time being taken seriously.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: NSP-SEC, (continued)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 23)
- Re: NSP-SEC Nick Hilliard (Mar 23)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Sean Donelan (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Gadi Evron (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Andrew D Kirch (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Sean Donelan (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC George Imburgia (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC James Bensley (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Rich Kulawiec (Mar 21)
- RE: NSP-SEC Alex Lanstein (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Lorand Jakab (Mar 22)
- RE: NSP-SEC Adam Stasiniewicz (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 19)