nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSP-SEC
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:59:26 -0400
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:13:48 BST, Guillaume FORTAINE said:
I have read with interest this document.
(lots of irrelevant commentary elided - the vast majority of which merely confirms the point that a lot of people have been doing further research on issues that we identified a decade and more ago)
In 1991, I was in primary school. In 2000, the date of your link, I got my first access to Internet. And now ? ;) !
And now, you're still acting like you've got new unique insights and going out of your way to irritate the very same more experienced people that you probably should be trying to learn from, when you haven't bothered to find out that you're once again 10 and 20 years behind the curve: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_%28Usenet%29 Wow. Rich Sexton really *did* contribute something important to the Net.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: NSP-SEC, (continued)
- Re: NSP-SEC Justin M. Streiner (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Hank Nussbacher (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Gadi Evron (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 22)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 22)
- Re: NSP-SEC Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Re: NSP-SEC Andrew D Kirch (Mar 22)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 22)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 23)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 23)
- Re: NSP-SEC Nick Hilliard (Mar 23)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Sean Donelan (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Gadi Evron (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Andrew D Kirch (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Sean Donelan (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC George Imburgia (Mar 20)