nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSP-SEC
From: Andrew D Kirch <trelane () trelane net>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:31:34 -0400
Guillaume FORTAINE wrote:
On 03/20/2010 09:12 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:2. Show you are responsive and responsible in handling issues in your own back yard.http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:ENEl1xrgXNwJ:https://ow.feide.no/_media/geantcampus:s5.2-flows_at_mu.pdf%3Fid%3Dgeantcampus%253Anetw_monitoring_oct_2009%26cache%3Dcache+s5.2-flows_at_mu&hl=en&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEEShCR2bC8bfpSow5e5Ebqi-x0szdV_rZN15cDn6t_nZpD6Vd-K-FRZ-sMpZy4k-7XJKWQdcsXt3hKYpc1M5RtNB_LMPahnYx9Zw8gSxEJ2WTjBQ5rn-KISGF8vE7qCOkyvHsPySt&sig=AHIEtbTjuYrs5deXJTat5R5_8Xb1oDQFNg http://isotf.org/pipermail/cii/2010-February/000137.html Best Regards, Guillaume FORTAINE
Are you done yet? Please go away. You're here posting from a webmail account at Microsoft, dictating some sort of network policy? Andrew
Current thread:
- Re: NSP-SEC, (continued)
- Re: NSP-SEC Andrew D Kirch (Mar 22)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 22)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 23)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 23)
- Re: NSP-SEC Nick Hilliard (Mar 23)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Sean Donelan (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Gadi Evron (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Andrew D Kirch (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Sean Donelan (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC George Imburgia (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC James Bensley (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Rich Kulawiec (Mar 21)
- RE: NSP-SEC Alex Lanstein (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Lorand Jakab (Mar 22)