nanog mailing list archives

Re: Lightly used IP addresses


From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 20:28:25 +0900

gosh, i must have completely misread section nine
Seeking contractual rights contrary to IETF RFCs 2008 and 2150?
oh, and if you feel that you have those rights by other means than the
lrsa, then why is section nine in the lrsa.  just remove it. 
Easy to do, you can either: 
1) Change the appropriate policy language (NRPM 6.4.1) via the ARIN policy 
   development process, in which case the LRSA will be updated as noted, or 
2) If you feel that you'd prefer a different forum, you can address this on a  
   more global basis (since each RIR has similar language regarding addresses) 
   by going through the IETF and revising the RFCs, which will likely result 
   in the RIRs all reviewing their documents accordingly.

oh.  was section nine of the lrsa done by the policy process?

please stop using the community consensus meme to cover for what you,
your lawyer, and your board came up with in a back room.

p.s. If you want to continue to discuss, can we shortly move this to
PPML 

no thanks.  

randy


Current thread: