nanog mailing list archives
RE: Google wants your Internet to be faster
From: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan () atlasnetworks us>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:29:37 +0000
Maybe the ISP's should move this choice to the consumer.
The consumer already has this option on many SOHO firewalls. No action by ISPs is required. But this is totally irrelevant to the idea of Net Neutrality.
I view this exercise as paying for priority when the circuit is full -- like a special carpool lane.
Carrier circuits should never be 'full', unless your definition of 'full' is 50-70%, IMHO. 100% full is a failure of engineering, business planning, and monitoring. Priority shouldn't be required. Best Regards, Nathan Eisenberg
Current thread:
- Re: Google wants your Internet to be faster, (continued)
- Re: Google wants your Internet to be faster Joly MacFie (Aug 10)
- Re: Google wants your Internet to be faster Kevin Oberman (Aug 10)
- Re: Google wants your Internet to be faster Matthew Palmer (Aug 09)
- Re: Google wants your Internet to be faster Christopher Morrow (Aug 09)
- Re: Google wants your Internet to be faster Sean Donelan (Aug 10)
- RE: Google wants your Internet to be faster Nathan Eisenberg (Aug 10)
- Re: Google wants your Internet to be faster Kenny Sallee (Aug 10)
- Re: Google wants your Internet to be faster Mike Sabbota (Aug 10)
- Re: Google wants your Internet to be faster Christopher Morrow (Aug 10)
- Re: Google wants your Internet to be faster Kenny Sallee (Aug 10)
- RE: Google wants your Internet to be faster Nathan Eisenberg (Aug 10)
- Re: Google wants your Internet to be faster Kenny Sallee (Aug 10)