nanog mailing list archives
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
From: Bill Bogstad <bogstad () pobox com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:58:43 -0400
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Frank Bulk - iName.com <frnkblk () iname com> wrote:
Don't forget the home gateway aspect -- it's a huge gaping hole in the IPv6 deployment strategy for ISPs. And don't talk to me about Apple's Airport Extreme. ISPs want (once the volume of IETF IPv6-related drafts has settled down) for every router at Wal-mart to include IPv6 support. If they start right now and presume that home gateways/routers are replaced every 3 to 5 years, it will be several years before they've covered even 50% of the homes.
Alternatively, they could commission the vendors to release firmware upgrades with IPv6 support for the most common older devices. Given that many of them are Linux based and the code already exists, this isn't likely to be technically difficult. The customer support costs, however, of convincing people to actually install the new firmware is another story. A consortium of ISPs could collectively work with the biggest OEMs/vendors to get this done if they wanted to do so. Start by commissioning IPv6 support into all new hardware. I would think that given the razor thin margins in home gateways/routers extra money coming in for simply turning on code which already exists would be attractive to at least some of them. Come up with some kind of logo for the program "IPv6 READY!". Make it a bandwagon thing so that vendors who aren't part of the program look behind the times. Offer some kind of cheap to implement network service to customers which can only be accessed via IPv6 to create user demand. Many people have said that the reason that no one is doing IPv6 is that there is nothing in it for the end users, so change that. Bill Bogstad
Current thread:
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?, (continued)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Leo Bicknell (Apr 18)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 18)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? joel jaeggli (Apr 18)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Leo Bicknell (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? sthaug (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Kevin Loch (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mohacsi Janos (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mark Smith (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? joel jaeggli (Apr 18)
- RE: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Frank Bulk - iName.com (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Bill Bogstad (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mohacsi Janos (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Bill Bogstad (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Leen Besselink (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mohacsi Janos (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Joe Provo (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? bmanning (Apr 19)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Owen DeLong (Apr 20)