Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

[Chris Campbell <Chris.Campbell () nebulassolutions com>]

On 19 Apr 2010, at 03:52, joel jaeggli wrote:

> On 4/18/2010 6:28 PM, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
> > Franck Martin wrote:
> > > Sure the internet will not die...
> > >
> > > But by the time we run out of IPv4 to allocate, the IPv6 network will not have completed to dual stack the current 
> > > IPv4 network. So what will happen?
> >
> > Reality is that as soon as SSL web servers and SSL-capable web browsers
> > have support for name-based virtual hosts, the number of IPv4 addresses
> > required will drop.  Right now, you need 1 IP address for 1 SSL site;
> > SNI spec of SSL gets rid of that.
>
> my load balancer needs 16 ips for every million simultaneous 
> connections, so does yours.

I'm pretty sure that's not the case for inbound connections...

http://vegan.net/pipermail/lb-l/2008-June/000871.html

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: