nanog mailing list archives
Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
From: David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
---- Original Message ---- From: Ray Soucy <rps () maine edu>
Or is it that you want IPv6 to be a 128-bit version of IPv4?
Yes, this is in fact exactly what the network operators keep saying.
RA is a good idea and it works. You can add options to DHCPv6, but I don't see many vendors implementing default gateway support unless you can make a real case for it. My fear is that your goal is to do away with RA completely and turn to DHCPv6 for all configuration. RA is actually quite nice. You really need to stop fighting it, because it's not going away.
RA may be quite nice for some cases. However, several examples over this thread alone have been provided about some other cases where it is something other than nice. DHCPv4 is not a perfect protocol, but it's widely deployed and understood. It also is a one-stop-shop for centralized host configuration. IPv6 does not currently have a similar one-stop-shop protocol, and this is a major gap in functionality. There are a bunch of very large providers and enterprises which number their DHCP-managed end-sites in the hundreds of thousands or millions. The inability to provide the same centralized configuration management should not be considered a feature. David Barak Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise: http://www.listentothefranchise.com
Current thread:
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN, (continued)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Joel Jaeggli (Oct 24)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Karl Auer (Oct 24)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Mark Smith (Oct 25)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Scott Morris (Oct 25)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Matthew Petach (Oct 26)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Joe Maimon (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN David Barak (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Vasil Kolev (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN James R. Cutler (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Karl Auer (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Mark Smith (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Joe Maimon (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN bmanning (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN bmanning (Oct 22)