nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN


From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:55:32 +0000

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:08:13PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 21 okt 2009, at 21:55, Owen DeLong wrote:

However, making it available as an option in DHCPv6 allows the end- 
user/operator
to choose the technology that fits their needs best. I do not know  
why you are so
determined to prevent this choice at the operator level.

For the same reason that we don't let the kids play with the  
powertools: giving them what they want here just makes everything end  
in tears.

If people want to run DHCPv6, fine, we're all adults. If they want to  
go to the IETF and fix what's wrong with DHCPv6, so much the better.  
But taking the information from the place where we can make sure it's  
correct and putting it in a place where we can only guess so we break  
the network regularly is A VERY BAD IDEA.

        so your not a fan of the smart edge and the stupid network.

--bill


Current thread: