nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cogent input

From: Justin Shore <justin () justinshore com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:13:02 -0500

John van Oppen wrote:

NTT (2914) and GBLX (3549) both do native v6...  most everyone else on
the tier1 list does tunnels.  :(

There are some nice tier2 networks who do native v6, tiscali and he.net
come to mind.

Let me rephrase that. :-) I know of no tier-Ns that offer any native v6services here in the Midwest (central Kansas) including L3 which onlyhas a best effort pilot program using tunnels. There might be moreoptions in KC or OKC but not here that I'm aware of...


Justin

Current thread:

Re: Cogent input, (continued)
- - - Re: Cogent input Michael K. Smith (Jun 16)
    - Re: Cogent input kris foster (Jun 16)
    - Re: Cogent input Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 16)
    - Re: Cogent input David Temkin (Jun 17)
  - Re: Cogent input Tore Anderson (Jun 11)
    - Re: Cogent input Justin Shore (Jun 11)
    - Re: Cogent input Paul Timmins (Jun 11)
    - RE: Cogent input John van Oppen (Jun 11)
    - Re: Cogent input Tore Anderson (Jun 11)
    - Re: Cogent input sthaug (Jun 11)
    - Re: Cogent input Justin Shore (Jun 12)
    - Re: Cogent input Leo Bicknell (Jun 12)
    - Re: Cogent input Kevin Hodle (Jun 17)
    - Re: Cogent input L K (Jun 18)
    - Re: Cogent input German Martinez (Jun 14)
    - IPv6 transits (Was: Cogent input) Jeroen Massar (Jun 14)
    - Re: IPv6 transits (Was: Cogent input) Robert Blayzor (Jun 18)
    - Re: IPv6 transits (Was: Cogent input) Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom (Jun 18)
    - Re: IPv6 transits sthaug (Jun 18)
    - Re: IPv6 transits Tomas Caslavsky (Jun 18)
    - Re: Cogent input Justin Shore (Jun 12)

(Thread continues...)