nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
From: chris rollin <2600hz () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:09:00 -0500
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Shon Elliott <shon () unwiredbb com> wrote:
Chris, Have you even read any of the other posts on here.
I fade in and out
I have been talking about spoofed packets in this thread multiple times.
man engrish
I do know what it is. I would appreciate you not making stupid comments like that.
As was stated before, this isnt about you In other news, it looks like ATT is quietly removing filters from cities. Chicago still showing down
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed., (continued)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Seth Mattinen (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Shon Elliott (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. John Bambenek (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Jon Lewis (Jul 27)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. goemon (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. chris rollin (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Shon Elliott (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. chris rollin (Jul 27)
- RE: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Tim Burke (Jul 27)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. John Bambenek (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. chris rollin (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. John Bambenek (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Joel Esler (Jul 27)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. William Pitcock (Jul 26)