nanog mailing list archives
RE: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:06:33 -0700
That host is not on any ThreatSTOP lists. (DShield, Cyber-TA, Shadowserver, and several others).
-----Original Message----- From: jamie [mailto:j () arpa com] Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 7:48 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. img.4chan.org is the biggest site - I've already received six replies
on
top of the list-replies confirming (b/c they saw this problem mentioned on sites/blogs) filtering. technical information, traces, bgp views (esp. from singly-homed T customers), etc, encouraged -jamieI don't see a below below.
Current thread:
- AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Joel Esler (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Seth Mattinen (Jul 26)
- Message not available
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. David Temkin (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. David Temkin (Jul 26)
- RE: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Tomas L. Byrnes (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Joel Esler (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Shon Elliott (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Shon Elliott (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Seth Mattinen (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Shon Elliott (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. John Bambenek (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Jon Lewis (Jul 27)