nanog mailing list archives

Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.

From: jamie <j () arpa com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:47:47 -0500

img.4chan.org is the biggest site - I've already received six replies on top
of the list-replies confirming (b/c they saw this problem mentioned on
sites/blogs) filtering.

technical information, traces, bgp views (esp. from singly-homed T
customers), etc, encouraged

-jamie

I don't see a below below.

Current thread:

AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Joel Esler (Jul 26)
  - Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Seth Mattinen (Jul 26)
- Message not available
  - Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
    - Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. David Temkin (Jul 26)
    - Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. David Temkin (Jul 26)
    - RE: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Tomas L. Byrnes (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Shon Elliott (Jul 26)
  - Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
    - Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Shon Elliott (Jul 26)
    - Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Seth Mattinen (Jul 26)
    - Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Shon Elliott (Jul 26)
    - Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. jamie (Jul 26)
    - Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. John Bambenek (Jul 26)

(Thread continues...)