nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:58:40 -0600
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:58 PM, Soucy, Ray wrote:We peer with Cogent. They are very competitive in terms of pricing. To be honest, Cogent has been pretty good to us. As long as you have a 2nd peer (which it sounds like you do) for backup I'd say they're a pretty safe bet.I think you mean s/peer/transit.
Perhaps he is running PPP, and meant peer. :P http://www.freesoft.org/CIE/RFC/1661/3.htmObviously he's paying for transit with his peer, which is still technically a peering agreement; just not a free one. ;)
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent (was the poetry thread), (continued)
- Re: Cogent (was the poetry thread) Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 12)
- Re: Cogent (was the poetry thread) Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 12)
- Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0 Martin List-Petersen (Jan 12)
- Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0 Seth Mattinen (Jan 12)
- RE: Cogent Haiku v2.0 John van Oppen (Jan 14)
- Cogent Considerations [was: Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0] Adam Young (Jan 12)
- Re: Cogent Considerations [was: Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0] Jim Shankland (Jan 12)
- Re: Cogent Considerations [was: Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0] Brandon Galbraith (Jan 12)
- RE: Cogent Haiku v2.0 Soucy, Ray (Jan 12)
- Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 12)
- Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0 Jack Bates (Jan 12)