Re: Cogent Considerations [was: Re: Cogent Haiku v2.0]

["Brandon Galbraith" <brandon.galbraith () gmail com>]

On 1/12/09, Jim Shankland <nanog () shankland org> wrote:
> Adam Young wrote:
>
> > I wouldn't take my word for it but truthfully, you get what you pay for.
> >  Given you have other, more reliable transit, adding Cogent may be ok.
> > I wouldn't rely on it for anything serious though.
>
> That has not been my experience.  Peering wars have been an issue, but
> aside from that, they've been fine.  (This is transit in San Francisco
> at the gigabit-plus level.)
>
> Jim Shankland
Seconded. We also have Cogent for gigabit transit. I had far more problems
in the short time we used Level3 for transit than I've had with Cogent.

-brandon

-- 
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: brandon.galbraith () gmail com