nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Confusion

From: Kevin Loch <kloch () kl net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:39:04 -0500

David Conrad wrote:

Yeah.  Rants about the IETF should probably be directed elsewhere.


Just how DO we get the message to the IETF that we need all the tools we
have in v4 (DHCP, VRRP, etc) to work with RA turned off?

- Kevin

Current thread:

Re: IPv6 Confusion, (continued)
- - - Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 17)
    - RE: IPv6 Confusion Frank Bulk (Feb 19)
    - RE: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 19)
    - RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 17)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 17)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Paul Ferguson (Feb 17)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Smith (Feb 17)
    - RE: IPv6 Confusion TJ (Feb 17)
    - RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 17)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 17)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Loch (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Nick Hilliard (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion John Schnizlein (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Aria Stewart (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Chuck Anderson (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Aria Stewart (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Leen Besselink (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Feb 18)

(Thread continues...)