nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Confusion
From: John Schnizlein <schnizlein () isoc org>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:51:48 -0500
Humor aside, the only practical answer is to show up at meetings and and on mailing lists and express your technical reasons. There are people there (in addition to me) who want the perspective of network operators.
John On 2009Feb18, at 2:45 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 18/02/2009 19:39, Kevin Loch wrote:Just how DO we get the message to the IETF that we need all the tools wehave in v4 (DHCP, VRRP, etc) to work with RA turned off?Easy. Disable all ipv4 at ietf meetings and change the address of the DNS server on the LAN every couple of minutes.Eating one's own dog food can concentrate the mind like nothing else.
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 Confusion, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 19)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Paul Ferguson (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Smith (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion TJ (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Loch (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nick Hilliard (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion John Schnizlein (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Aria Stewart (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Chuck Anderson (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Aria Stewart (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Leen Besselink (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)