nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Confusion
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:05:25 +0900
Also, a proposal for a different approach is at: http://mice.cs.columbia.edu/getTechreport.php?techreportID=560 (PDF)
which has an internet draft, draft-ymbk-aplusp-02.txt randy
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 Confusion, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion TJ (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Fred Baker (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Scott Howard (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Owen DeLong (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Carl Rosevear (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Owen DeLong (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Smith (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Oberman (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Frank Bulk (Feb 19)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 19)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Carl Rosevear (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Paul Ferguson (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Smith (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion TJ (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Loch (Feb 18)