nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Confusion

From: Aria Stewart <aredridel () nbtsc org>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:55:19 -0700

On 18/02/2009 19:39, Kevin Loch wrote:
Just how DO we get the message to the IETF that we need all thetools we
have in v4 (DHCP, VRRP, etc) to work with RA turned off?


What operational reasons are there for working with RA turned off?

Aria Stewart
aredridel () nbtsc org

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description:

Current thread:

RE: IPv6 Confusion, (continued)
- - - RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 17)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 17)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Paul Ferguson (Feb 17)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Smith (Feb 17)
    - RE: IPv6 Confusion TJ (Feb 17)
    - RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 17)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 17)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Loch (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Nick Hilliard (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion John Schnizlein (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Aria Stewart (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Chuck Anderson (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Aria Stewart (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Leen Besselink (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
    - Re: IPv6 Confusion Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 18)

(Thread continues...)