RE: IPv6 Confusion

["TJ" <trejrco () gmail com>]

> > So we deploy v6 addresses to clients, and save the remaining v4 addresses
for servers. Problem solved?
> I have been suggesting that for a long time.
>
> However I am not suggesting IPv6-only to clients. See my other email on
this
> from a minute or so ago.
>
> The way I see things going in the medium term:
> * IPv4 SP-NAT
> * IPv6 native to clients


+1 

Wait, can I vote more than once?  
If so, +(more).


<<SNIP>>