nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Confusion
From: David Freedman <david.freedman () uk clara net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:05:19 +0000
It's a 128 bit address. Routing is done on VLSM, but, generally for DNS purposes, these are expected to be at least on nibble boundaries. There is an intent to support what is known as EUI-64, which means every subnet should be a /64, however, there are people who number smaller subnets and that is supposed to work, but, it will break certain IPv6 things like stateless autoconfiguration (which is optional).
We are one of these people who opted to use smaller subnet sizes for point-to-point networks (i.e router transfer nets), If you are interested in what we did and want to see some examples of what other people are doing check out a presentation that I gave some time ago about our deployment http://www.convergence.cx/ipv6clara.ppt (apologies for the lack of PDF) Slides 2-15 Dave.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Confusion, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Oberman (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Stephen Sprunk (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Jeff S Wheeler (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Freedman (Feb 19)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Dave Pooser (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Justin Shore (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Michael Thomas (Feb 18)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 18)