nanog mailing list archives

Re: v6 & DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space


From: Mark Newton <newton () internode com au>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:09:52 +1030


On 10/02/2009, at 11:03 AM, Jack Bates wrote:

There is if you have a dual-stack device, your L4-and-above protocols
are the same under v4 and v6, and you don't want to reinvent the ALG wheel.

ALG only fixes some problems, and it's not required for as much when address translations are not being performed.

On a commodity consumer CPE device, the ALG code doubles as a
stateful inspection engine.

So it _is_ required when address translations are not being performed.

Is security something that gets thought about now, or post-deployment?

  - mark

--
Mark Newton Email: newton () internode com au (W) Network Engineer Email: newton () atdot dotat org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd                         Desk:   +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton"  Mobile: +61-416-202-223







Current thread: