nanog mailing list archives
Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: "James R. Cutler" <james.cutler () consultant com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:35:15 -0500
Clarification here:1/8 was never on the EDS backbone. Was only used locally in one site, as far as I can determine.
On Feb 4, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
I see you've never done business with EDS. They've been using 1/8 for over a decade. Also, over the years, I've seen a number of universities and supercomputing facilities number nodes out of 1/8 -- however, thosesystems are never supposed to see the internet anyway, so they couldtechnically number them however they want. Personally, I've used 1/8 inlab setups.brilliant! i think all my competitors should do that. randy
James R. Cutler james.cutler () consultant com
Current thread:
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space, (continued)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Bruce Grobler (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Coulson (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matthew Palmer (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Ricky Beam (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Måns Nilsson (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Randy Bush (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space James R. Cutler (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Ricky Beam (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Owen DeLong (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Nathan Ward (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Adrian Chadd (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Seth Mattinen (Feb 02)