nanog mailing list archives

Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space


From: Måns Nilsson <mansaxel () besserwisser org>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:09:22 +0100

--On onsdag, onsdag 4 feb 2009 17.44.20 -0500 Ricky Beam <jfbeam () gmail com>
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:29:36 -0500, Skeeve Stevens <skeeve () skeeve org>
wrote:
I agree... I'd love to know where they got that from... who even wrote  
it?

I see you've never done business with EDS.  They've been using 1/8 for
over a decade.  Also, over the years, I've seen a number of universities
and supercomputing facilities number nodes out of 1/8 -- however, those
systems are never supposed to see the internet anyway, so they could
technically number them however they want.  Personally, I've used 1/8 in
lab setups.

Last time I built a supercomputer (as in a cluster of run-of-the-mill
servers) RIPE gave us a /21 -- I wanted a /20 for the expected upgrade but
was told I had to reapply. The compute nodes need to read files from AFS
from CERN or another university, so NAT'ing them is so not an option. 

-- 
Måns Nilsson                    M A C H I N A

Sign my PETITION.

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: