nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband
From: Fred Baker <fred () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:38:38 -0700
If it's about stimulus money, I'm in favor of saying that broadband implies fiber to the home. That would provide all sorts of stimuli to the economy - infrastructure, equipment sales, jobs digging ditches, and so on. I could pretty quickly argue myself into suggesting special favors for deployment of DNSSEC, multicast, and IPv6. As in, use the stimulus money to propel a leap forward, not just waste it.
On Aug 26, 2009, at 9:44 AM, Carlos Alcantar wrote:
I think the big push to get the fcc to define broadband is highly based on the rus/ntia setting definitions of what broadband is. If any anyonehas been fallowing the rus/ntia they are the one handing out all the stimulus infrastructure grant loan money. So there are a lot ofpolitical reasons to make the definition of broadband a bit slower than one would think. I guess it doesn't hurt that the larger lec's with theolder infrastructure are shelling out the money to lobby to make sure the definition stays as low as can be. They don't want to see the gov funding there competition. Just my 2 cents. -carlos -----Original Message----- From: Ted Fischer [mailto:ted () fred net] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 8:50 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Paul Timmins wrote:Fred Baker wrote:On Aug 24, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Luke Marrott wrote:What are your thoughts on what the definition of Broadband should begoing forward? I would assume this will be the standard definition for a number of years to come.Historically, narrowband was circuit switched (ISDN etc) andbroadbandwas packet switched. Narrowband was therefore tied to the digitalsignaling hierarchy and was in some way a multiple of 64 KBPS. As theterm was used then, broadband delivery options of course included virtual circuits bearing packets, like Frame Relay and ATM.of or relating to or being a communications network in which the bandwidth can be divided and shared by multiple simultaneous signals(asfor voice or data or video) That's my humble opinion. Let them use a new term, like "High Speed Internet".Seconded
Current thread:
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband, (continued)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Jack Bates (Aug 28)
- RE: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Frank Bulk (Aug 28)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Chris Adams (Aug 27)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Xaver Aerni (Aug 27)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Jack Bates (Aug 27)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Leo Bicknell (Aug 27)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Jack Bates (Aug 27)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Alexander Harrowell (Aug 27)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Fred Baker (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband jim deleskie (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Jack Bates (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Joel Esler (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Jack Bates (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Roy (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Jack Bates (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Stephen Sprunk (Aug 26)