nanog mailing list archives

Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband


From: Fred Baker <fred () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:38:38 -0700

If it's about stimulus money, I'm in favor of saying that broadband implies fiber to the home. That would provide all sorts of stimuli to the economy - infrastructure, equipment sales, jobs digging ditches, and so on. I could pretty quickly argue myself into suggesting special favors for deployment of DNSSEC, multicast, and IPv6. As in, use the stimulus money to propel a leap forward, not just waste it.

On Aug 26, 2009, at 9:44 AM, Carlos Alcantar wrote:

I think the big push to get the fcc to define broadband is highly based on the rus/ntia setting definitions of what broadband is. If any anyone
has been fallowing the rus/ntia they are the one handing out all the
stimulus infrastructure grant loan money.  So there are a lot of
political reasons to make the definition of broadband a bit slower than one would think. I guess it doesn't hurt that the larger lec's with the
older infrastructure are shelling out the money to lobby to make sure
the definition stays as low as can be.  They don't want to see the gov
funding there competition.  Just my 2 cents.

-carlos

-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Fischer [mailto:ted () fred net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 8:50 AM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband



Paul Timmins wrote:
Fred Baker wrote:

On Aug 24, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Luke Marrott wrote:

What are your thoughts on what the definition of Broadband should be

going
forward? I would assume this will be the standard definition for a
number of
years to come.


Historically, narrowband was circuit switched (ISDN etc) and
broadband
was packet switched. Narrowband was therefore tied to the digital
signaling hierarchy and was in some way a multiple of 64 KBPS. As the

term was used then, broadband delivery options of course included
virtual circuits bearing packets, like Frame Relay and ATM.
of or relating to or being a communications network in which the
bandwidth can be divided and shared by multiple simultaneous signals
(as
for voice or data or video)

That's my humble opinion. Let them use a new term, like "High Speed
Internet".


Seconded






Current thread: