nanog mailing list archives
Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests
From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer () hezmatt org>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:23:22 +1000
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 04:41:46PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Apr 21, 2009, at 4:22 PM, Ken A wrote:Chris Adams wrote:Once upon a time, Jo Rhett <jrhett () netconsonance com> said:Since virtual web hosting has no technical justification for IP space, I refuse it.SSL and FTP are techincal justifications for an IP per site.Right. Also, monthly bandwidth monitoring/shaping/capping are more easily done using one ip per hosted domain, or ftp site, or whatever. Otherwise you are parsing logs or using 3rd party apache modules.*Shrug* I've been doing IP allocations for 14 years and that's never been mentioned to me.
Oh, you lucky, lucky person. We've got a couple of customers at the day job that constantly come back to us for more IP addresses for bandwidth accounting purposes for their colo machine(s). Attempts at education are like talking to a particularly stupid brick wall. - Matt
Current thread:
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"], (continued)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Chris Grundemann (Apr 23)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Matthew Kaufman (Apr 23)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests David Conrad (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Roger Marquis (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Justin M. Streiner (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Chris Adams (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Ken A (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Matthew Palmer (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 23)