nanog mailing list archives

Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests


From: Roger Marquis <marquis () roble com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:45:35 -0700 (PDT)

David Conrad wrote:
The term "legacy" here is relevant. Under what agreement would an RIR evaluate an allocation that occurred prior to the existence of the RIR? And when the folks who received legacy space and don't like this upstart RIR nosing around in their business, the legal fees that the RIR incur will cost non-trivial amounts of, well, money.

Good points all.  I fully admit to ignorance of how to remedy this and the
other valid points raised in defence of the status quo (except by raising
the issue when appropriate).

Not sure what could be cited as presidence either, except perhaps the
transition from feudal landowning aristocracies a few centuries back.

Roger Marquis


Current thread: