nanog mailing list archives
RE: Seattle Peering
From: "Paul Stewart" <pstewart () nexicomgroup net>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:25:26 -0400
Thanks very much... we have a price from S&D for the x-connect. If we connect on the PAIX side (most likely) do we need multiple VLAN's? I had planned on a single VLAN on the port for there - just need to understand ;) Thanks, Paul -----Original Message----- From: Chris Caputo [mailto:ccaputo () alt net] Sent: September 23, 2008 6:13 PM To: Paul Stewart; Michael K. Smith Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: Seattle Peering On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Michael K. Smith wrote:
Hello Paul: On 9/18/08 8:01 AM, "Paul Stewart" <pstewart () nexicomgroup net> wrote:Hi folks... We're working on some plans to peer in the Seattle area. Choices so
far
considered are SIX and PAIX Seattle pretty much.... I was of the impression that if you get a port on one of these exchanges, you can connect to the other one as well? Just looking
for
clarification from folks who are connected out there..;) Any
charges to
go between the exchanges or it just included?Speaking from the SIX side, there is no charge to connect to the
fabric if
you supply the optics, and there is a one-time fiber cross connect
charge of
$200.00 US. The SIX and PAIX are directly connected and you can peer
across
the fabric. The SIX page is http://www.seattleix.net for more info or
you
can email me directly.
And keep in mind that while the SIX and PAIX-SEA are directly connected, the exchanges are on different VLANs from the perspective of a PAIX-SEA connection. If you connect on the SIX side, you can only reach the SIX fabric. No MRC. If you connect on the PAIX-SEA side, you can reach both the SIX fabric and the PAIX-SEA fabric via a single router port. For MRC talk to an S&D rep. Chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and contains confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and then destroy this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. Thank you."
Current thread:
- RE: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream, (continued)
- RE: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream David Schwartz (Sep 17)
- Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream Seth Mattinen (Sep 17)
- Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Sep 17)
- Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream Lamar Owen (Sep 17)
- RE: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream Tomas L. Byrnes (Sep 17)
- Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream David Ulevitch (Sep 17)
- Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 18)
- Seattle Peering Paul Stewart (Sep 18)
- Re: Seattle Peering Michael K. Smith (Sep 18)
- Re: Seattle Peering Chris Caputo (Sep 23)
- RE: Seattle Peering Paul Stewart (Sep 23)
- RE: Seattle Peering Chris Caputo (Sep 23)
- Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream Christopher Morrow (Sep 17)
- Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream Steve Gibbard (Sep 17)
- Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream Andy Davidson (Sep 18)
- Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeered at 2:25am est James Thomas (Sep 21)
- Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream Gadi Evron (Sep 17)
- Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream Christopher Morrow (Sep 17)
- Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 18)
- Re: Atrivo/Intercage: Now Only 1 Upstream Christopher Morrow (Sep 17)