nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again...
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 07:56:45 +0100
* Sean Donelan:
I just wish the IETF would acknowledge this and go ahead and define a DNS bit for artificial DNS answers for all these "address correction" and "domain parking" and "domain tasting" people to use for their keen "Web 2.0" ideas. And for all the other non-Web protocols which get confused, can treat that artificially generated crap/answers like NXDOMAIN.
It's not that simple, you need three states: original, rewritten NODATA, and rewritten NXDOMAIN. Perhaps a general "original RCODE" is necessary; I haven't checked this.
Current thread:
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again..., (continued)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 05)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Bill Stewart (Nov 05)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Andrew Sullivan (Nov 05)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Sean Donelan (Nov 04)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 04)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Eliot Lear (Nov 04)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Sean Donelan (Nov 04)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Eliot Lear (Nov 04)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Joe Greco (Nov 05)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 05)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Florian Weimer (Nov 04)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... John Kristoff (Nov 05)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Mark Andrews (Nov 05)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Steve Atkins (Nov 06)
- Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again... Martin Hannigan (Nov 06)