nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: Igor Gashinsky <igor () gashinsky net>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:57:42 -0400 (EDT)
:: Isn't his point that y! could offer IPv6 e-mail in parallel to the :: existing IPv4 service, putting the IPv6 machines in a subdomain :: ipv6.yahoo.com, so that end users and networks who want to do it can :: do so without bothering the others? Not speaking directly for my employer (in any official capacity that is), but it's is *not* as easy as as just IPv6 enabling our network, enabling ipv6 on the servers, and putting up ipv6.yahoo.com. Currently, the biggest roadblock we have is loadbalancer support (or, more specificly, lack of thereof) for IPv6 (hell, we still can't even get a stable version of code that does IPv4 SACK/other useful tcp options in some LB modes). Once we get past that, I'm sure something else will be an issue (as it has in the past), but believe me, we *are* actively working towards v6, it is just a slow process right now with a lot of moving pieces, and an obvious mandate not to negatively impact the current v4 infrastructure... Thanks, -igor
Current thread:
- Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted), (continued)
- Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Paul Vixie (Jun 02)
- Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Donald Stahl (Jun 02)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Simon Leinen (Jun 03)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Chris Owen (Jun 03)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Stephen Satchell (Jun 03)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jun 04)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Donald Stahl (Jun 04)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 04)
- Re: NAT Multihoming Donald Stahl (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Igor Gashinsky (Jun 03)
- IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted Igor Gashinsky (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted matthew zeier (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted william(at)elan.net (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted matthew zeier (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Jun 04)